UK Hospitality & Food Service Trade News

News

"Six Weeks In: How Hospitality Is Absorbing the April Living Wage Rise"

"Six Weeks In: How Hospitality Is Absorbing the April Living Wage Rise"
Photo: Karolina Grabowska via Pexels

The National Living Wage rises to £12.21 per hour on 1 April — a 6.7% increase on the current £11.44 rate — and the hospitality sector, where a disproportionately high share of the workforce is employed at or close to minimum wage, is in the final stages of absorbing what it means for their cost base.

For businesses that modelled the impact early, the picture is clear if uncomfortable. A kitchen operation with 12 front-of-house and back-of-house staff predominantly on minimum wage, working an average of 30 hours per week, is looking at an additional payroll cost of approximately £18,000 per year from April. For a restaurant turning over £700,000 annually — a reasonable mid-market independent — that is a 2.6% increase in total cost base, which has to be recovered from a margin that was already under pressure from food cost inflation and energy costs.

What Operators Are Doing

The responses fall into three broad categories. The first and most common is a menu price increase. The majority of operators who spoke to The Mise in the run-up to April confirmed they were introducing price adjustments of between 3 and 5% alongside the wage change — timed to the new financial year to make the rationale transparent to guests.

"We're not pretending it isn't happening," said one London operator running three sites. "The menu's going up on the 1st of April because the wage bill is going up. We think guests understand that better than a menu that changes three times a year with no explanation."

The second response is a reduction in hours or headcount, particularly in the form of reduced opening days rather than redundancies. Several operators across the sector have announced the elimination of quiet weekday lunch services that were already marginal — Monday and Tuesday in particular — to remove the labour cost associated with services that do not justify their staffing requirement.

The third response, most common among operators with access to capital, is investment in automation or technology that reduces the labour intensity of certain operations. This ranges from self-service ordering systems and kiosk payments at the quick-service end to automated dishwashing, prep equipment and scheduling technology in full-service environments.

The Apprenticeship Rate Problem

A less-discussed consequence of the April increase is the widening gap between the adult NLW and the apprenticeship rate, which rises to only £7.55 per hour. The apprenticeship rate is intended to make it financially viable for employers to invest in training time for younger workers, but operators in the sector have noted that the gap — now almost £5 per hour — makes it increasingly difficult to recruit adult apprentices who can earn considerably more in unqualified hospitality roles than in a formal training position.

Several training providers have raised concerns that the widening differential is depressing take-up of culinary apprenticeships at a time when the sector is already experiencing a structural skills shortage. The government has not indicated any plans to revisit the apprenticeship rate outside the standard annual review cycle.

The Broader Picture

The April increase continues a trajectory that has seen the NLW rise by 33% over the past four years. For an industry that employs approximately 3.5 million people and has a wage structure concentrated toward the minimum, the cumulative effect of that trajectory is substantial — and is not fully recoverable through menu price increases in a market where consumer spending remains under pressure.

The businesses that are managing the transition most effectively are those that started modelling the impact in the autumn, made pricing decisions proactively and have a staffing structure that allows some flexibility in hours without compromising service quality. The businesses that are struggling are those that delayed, made no pricing adjustments and are now facing the full increase hitting their April payroll without mitigation in place.